Changing the wording around the django-like components statement

This commit is contained in:
Christopher Allan Webber 2011-04-30 09:31:03 -05:00
parent 2514dc0280
commit 109c87f829

View File

@ -47,11 +47,10 @@ Why WSGI Minimalism
Chris Webber on "Why WSGI Minimalism": Chris Webber on "Why WSGI Minimalism":
If you notice in the technology listI list a lot of If you notice in the technology list I list a lot of components
components that are very `Django Project`_, but not actually that are very "django-like", but not actually `Django`_
Django components. What can I say, I really like a lot of the components. What can I say, I really like a lot of the ideas in
ideas in Django! Which leads to the question: why not just use Django! Which leads to the question: why not just use Django?
Django?
While I really like Django's ideas and a lot of its components, I While I really like Django's ideas and a lot of its components, I
also feel that most of the best ideas in Django I want have been also feel that most of the best ideas in Django I want have been
@ -85,7 +84,7 @@ Chris Webber on "Why WSGI Minimalism":
deployment-howto, especially in the former making some notes on deployment-howto, especially in the former making some notes on
how to make it easier for Django hackers to get started. how to make it easier for Django hackers to get started.
.. _Django Project: http://www.djangoproject.com/ .. _Django: http://www.djangoproject.com/
.. _Pylons: http://pylonshq.com/ .. _Pylons: http://pylonshq.com/
.. _Pyramid: http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/dev/ .. _Pyramid: http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/dev/
.. _Flask: http://flask.pocoo.org/ .. _Flask: http://flask.pocoo.org/